We give a simple counterexample which shows that, for Reed--Solomon codes over multiplicative subgroups of prime fields, proximity gaps do not hold near capacity, at least not as conjectured by Ben-Sasson, et al., in BCIKS20. For relative distance , where is the rate of the code, and positive , where is the length of the code, we construct an affine line that is not entirely -close to the code but still contains such points. The same construction gives a slightly stronger list-decoding lower bound. The proof uses a new additive-combinatorics lemma on sums of roots of unity.